I moved to the US for Meta. When layoffs came, I was scared of losing my new life, not just my job.

· Business Insider

Rafa Maximo moved to the US in 2019.
  • Rafa Maximo relocated to the US as a Meta employee.
  • When job cuts were rumored, he wondered what being laid off on a visa would mean for his life and family.
  • Visa holders shouldn't build their lives around their company, Maximo said.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Rafa Maximo, 38, who lives in Miami and worked at Meta. The following has been edited for length and clarity.

Visit h-doctor.club for more information.

When I joined Facebook in 2018, it felt like a big deal. I lived in Brazil at the time, where there were fewer opportunities at such big companies.

My job was to train media agencies and professionals in Latin America to use our tools for advertising. After roughly a year, the company offered to transfer me to the US.

I was not only willing to relocate to take the opportunity to grow my career, but to pivot my entire life around it. I left for Miami in 2019.

It wasn't until November 2022, when Meta conducted a mass layoff, that I realized how closely my life was tied to the company as a visa holder.

Witnessing mass layoffs was very scary as a visa holder

I went to the US on an L-1 visa, which is for internal company transfers, and my wife became my dependent on an L-2. Unlike an H-1B, you can't switch employers on an L-1 without applying for a new visa. I didn't mind not really having the option to move companies, because I really loved my job and felt I had access to good opportunities at Meta.

We agreed that my wife would pause her career while we focused on relocating, and we had our daughter soon after.

I felt the weight of having an L-1 visa rather than an H-1B while on holiday in Brazil in 2022. I read in the news that Meta was planning to cut jobs. If I lost my job, I couldn't transfer to another company as easily, and I'd likely have to try to change my immigration status.

Maximo is now a permanent resident in the US.

The possibility of being laid off had never occurred to me because I couldn't recall anything like this happening at Meta before. My teammates started messaging me, asking if it was real. When it dawned on me that it was, it was very scary.

I wondered if I would be able to go back to the US if I were laid off. What would happen to my lease, to my daughter who was enrolled at pre-school, and to my cat, who was in the US with her cat-sitter? Would I at least be able to get all my stuff back?

I didn't even have a personal computer or cellphone anymore, because I left them behind when I moved to the US and used what the company provided. I realized how much my life was tied to Facebook.

The layoffs weren't just about my job, but my life.

I wouldn't advise building your identity around your employer

Not long after I found out I wasn't impacted by the layoffs, I self-petitioned for a green card so I wouldn't have to go through anything like that again.

I received permanent residency in 2025 and feel lighter and more in control. I resigned from Meta in 2024, and I'm now using my green card status to work as an independent AI marketing and digital growth advisor.

But there are still logistics to think about, like renewing my green card because I'm not yet a US citizen.

In today's work environment, we don't have control over a lot of things, and you can suddenly be laid off. My advice to visa holders in Big Tech is not to build their entire identities around the companies they work for.

Instead, build something within your company that will serve you if you were to lose your job. What will develop you as a professional?

We need to protect ourselves too, especially our minds, our health, and our families.

Do you have a story to share about being laid off on a visa? Contact this reporter at [email protected]

Read the original article on Business Insider

Leggi l'articolo completo alla fonte

Tribunal finds Bogdanov’s false PhD claim was ‘intentional and fraudulent’

· Citizen

The Financial Services Tribunal has dismissed former EOH director Anushka Bogdanov’s application for reconsideration of the JSE’s sanctions against her, after finding that her false claim to hold a PhD from London Business School was intentional and fraudulent.

Last year, the JSE imposed a public censure, fined her R500 000, and disqualified her from holding office as a director or officer of a company listed on the JSE for 10 years.

Visit afrikasportnews.co.za for more information.

Bogdanov pleads for reconsideration

Bogdanov applied for reconsideration, claiming she was under the “genuine belief” that the PhD had been conferred, that she had received no unlawful gain, that no market harm had resulted, and that the sanctions were disproportionate to those imposed in other matters.

She also contended her health had not been adequately considered and that she had been denied a fair hearing before the JSE Sens announcement.

The Tribunal dismissed the key arguments Bogdanov advanced in support of her application.

“When the applicant submitted her CV to EOH, she included the PhD qualification. This was intentional and fraudulent. The Tribunal takes a firm view that this appears to constitute elements of criminal conduct.”

In comparing sanctions imposed in other matters, it found that “each case must be considered on its own facts”.

Bogdanov’s illness

The Tribunal acknowledged the JSE had considered her illness as a mitigating factor, but found that the forgeries, false submissions, and her “blatant failure to respond to queries by the JSE for a period of three years” were aggravating factors.

“She was healthy enough to conduct a business, serve all kinds of functions, study for another doctorate, but too ill to answer simple requests.”

Background

Bogdanov was appointed to the EOH board on 20 June 2019, serving as chair of the Social and Ethics Committee and a member of the Governance and Risk Committee. In February 2020, she became EOH’s lead independent non-executive director.

EOH changed its name to iOCO, but that was a few years after Bogdanov had left the group.

At the time of her appointment, her CV claimed that she held a PhD in International Finance from London Business School (LBS). She also submitted a Schedule 13 Director’s Declaration to the JSE confirming she held a PhD.

Forged PhD certificate

In March 2020, a forged LBS PhD certificate was submitted to EOH in support of Bogdanov’s claimed qualification; the Tribunal later found that the forgeries were either committed by Bogdanov herself or with her knowledge and consent.

Also in March 2020, during the Prudential Authority (PA) vetting process for Bogdanov’s proposed appointment to the African Bank board, a dossier signed off by Bogdanov was submitted to the PA. It included her CV and a copy of the fraudulent LBS PhD certificate.

However, a whistleblower came forward, and on 25 March 2020, the LBS confirmed that the PhD certificate was forged and recommended legal action against Bogdanov.

Bogdanov blamed an unnamed executive assistant/secretary for the forgeries.

EOH’s investigations unit, IRMS, later confirmed on 23 July that the certificate was fraudulent due to an incorrect logo, spelling errors, the fact that LBS did not have a vice chancellor position, and the fact that it did not offer a doctorate in International Financial Services.

Less than a week later, Bogdanov resigned as director on 28 July 2020.

Lengthy JSE investigation

After EOH notified the JSE of the qualification discrepancy, the JSE initiated an investigation that lasted for more than three years. During the investigation, the JSE made repeated requests for proof of the qualification or a substantive response to its allegations.

Bogdanov requested multiple extensions, citing health difficulties, and did not provide the requested documentation.

She only admitted in October 2024 that the PhD was never awarded to her and that “an unnamed individual had forged the certificate she relied on, without her knowledge or consent”.

‘Deeply traumatic incident’

In papers filed with the Tribunal, Bogdanov claimed that she registered at LBS in 2005 and completed her thesis in 2008. She defended the thesis in a viva voce examination in July 2008, leaving the examination believing the degree had been conferred.

According to Bogdanov’s account, after returning to her apartment following the viva voce examination, she found her husband “in the act with two members of LBS faculty”. She said she was in a state of shock and immediately returned to South Africa, which later led to her divorce.

The Tribunal rejected this and stated in the ruling that “even though she alleges that she was so traumatised by the event in the flat involving her husband and two ladies from the LBS faculty, there is no logical excuse for failing to follow up with her supervisors regarding the required supplementation, nor for failing to address the traumatic incident involving its staff directly with LBS”.

“This, in all likelihood, is not true in the absence of contrary evidence.”

The Tribunal also rejected her claim that she believed the degree was conferred. “The examiners raised questions during the session to which she had to attend; however, she was convinced that a PhD had been awarded without addressing those queries. The above, on its own, is implausible.”

The Tribunal also noted that Bogdanov never supplied any copies of registration documents, thesis correspondence, or supervisor communications.

PhD from the University of Northampton

Bogdanov’s papers noted that she had subsequently obtained a Doctor of Business Administration from the University of Northampton.

The Tribunal acknowledged this but observed that, following the hearing, her attorneys provided information about the qualification without proof of its conferment. The Tribunal stated: “In our considered view, this is the same approach that the applicant ought to have taken in respect of the LBS PhD to both EOH and JSE.”

Moneyweb asked the University of Northampton to confirm whether Bogdanov studied there, but the university declined, citing data protection rules.

The Tribunal dismissed the application for reconsideration in its entirety, leaving the JSE’s sanctions intact.

Moneyweb reached out to Bogdanov for comment on the ruling, but she has not responded by the time of publication. We will add this response when we receive it.

This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.

Leggi l'articolo completo alla fonte

Maharashtra govt buys Mumbai's landmark Air India building for Rs 1,601 crore

· India Today

Leggi l'articolo completo alla fonte